Javice Says Jamie Dimon Had Private Curiosity in Acquisition


The JPMorgan Chase case in opposition to a fintech startup accused of misrepresenting its consumer base with thousands and thousands of pretend accounts is heating up. In court docket papers filed Monday, Charlie Javice — who allegedly colluded with Frank exec Olivier Amar and an unnamed information scientist to make up 4.25 million prospects — acknowledged that billionaire Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon was personally interested by buying her firm.

Fortune reviews Dimon allegedly informed Javice he thought his firm ought to “get the deal achieved” previous to the $175 million acquisition. The founder additionally argues that JPMorgan knew her monetary assist firm’s true measurement and did the deal anyway. Consequently, she is reportedly demanding the case go to trial.

In response to questions filed in a Delaware court docket, Javice wrote that JPMorgan’s lawsuit in opposition to Frank quantities to a “huge CYA effort by these accountable inside JPMC (JPMorgan Chase) to shift the blame for a failed and now-regretted acquisition to somebody they considered as a simple goal: its younger feminine founder.”

This is extra from Fortune by the use of Yahoo Finance:

Javice contends JPMorgan Chase knew precisely what it was getting when it purchased Frank, which claimed to simplify the monetary assist course of, in 2021. The financial institution solely wanted to have a look at public data, valuations for comparable corporations on the time, and its personal diligence to get an correct image of Frank, the court docket submitting mentioned. By its personal admission, JPMorgan Chase performed a number of weeks of due diligence on Frank in the course of the summer season of 2021, Fortune has reported, citing JPMorgan’s December lawsuit. Javice, in her preliminary criticism in opposition to JPMorgan for bills, mentioned the financial institution dedicated appreciable assets to the deal, involving a whole bunch of its workers in diligence of Frank

JPMorgan Chase spokesman Pablo Rodriguez responded that the corporate’s “authorized claims in opposition to Ms. Javice and Mr. Amar are set out in our criticism, together with the important thing details. We stand behind our allegations, and this dispute might be resolved by the authorized course of.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here