Solidity 0.6.x options: strive/catch assertion

The strive/catch syntax launched in 0.6.0 is arguably the largest leap in error dealing with capabilities in Solidity, since motive strings for revert and require have been launched in v0.4.22. Each strive and catch have been reserved key phrases since v0.5.9 and now we are able to use them to deal with failures in exterior operate calls with out rolling again the entire transaction (state modifications within the referred to as operate are nonetheless rolled again, however the ones within the calling operate aren’t).

We’re transferring one step away from the purist “all-or-nothing” method in a transaction lifecycle, which falls in need of sensible behaviour we regularly need.

Dealing with exterior name failures

The strive/catch assertion lets you react on failed exterior calls and contract creation calls, so you can not use it for inner operate calls. Be aware that to wrap a public operate name inside the identical contract with strive/catch, it may be made exterior by calling the operate with this..

The instance beneath demonstrates how strive/catch is utilized in a manufacturing unit sample the place contract creation may fail. The next CharitySplitter contract requires a compulsory tackle property _owner in its constructor.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;

contract CharitySplitter {
    tackle public proprietor;
    constructor (tackle _owner) public {
        require(_owner != tackle(0), "no-owner-provided");
        proprietor = _owner;
    }
}

There’s a manufacturing unit contract — CharitySplitterFactory which is used to create and handle situations of CharitySplitter. Within the manufacturing unit we are able to wrap the new CharitySplitter(charityOwner) in a strive/catch as a failsafe for when that constructor may fail due to an empty charityOwner being handed.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
import "./CharitySplitter.sol";
contract CharitySplitterFactory {
    mapping (tackle => CharitySplitter) public charitySplitters;
    uint public errorCount;
    occasion ErrorHandled(string motive);
    occasion ErrorNotHandled(bytes motive);
    operate createCharitySplitter(tackle charityOwner) public {
        strive new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        } catch {
            errorCount++;
        }
    }
}

Be aware that with strive/catch, solely exceptions occurring contained in the exterior name itself are caught. Errors contained in the expression aren’t caught, for instance if the enter parameter for the new CharitySplitter is itself a part of an inner name, any errors it raises is not going to be caught. Pattern demonstrating this behaviour is the modified createCharitySplitter operate. Right here the CharitySplitter constructor enter parameter is retrieved dynamically from one other operate — getCharityOwner. If that operate reverts, on this instance with “revert-required-for-testing”, that won’t be caught within the strive/catch assertion.

operate createCharitySplitter(tackle _charityOwner) public {
    strive new CharitySplitter(getCharityOwner(_charityOwner, false))
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    } catch (bytes reminiscence motive) {
        ...
    }
}
operate getCharityOwner(tackle _charityOwner, bool _toPass)
        inner returns (tackle) {
    require(_toPass, "revert-required-for-testing");
    return _charityOwner;
}

Retrieving the error message

We are able to additional lengthen the strive/catch logic within the createCharitySplitter operate to retrieve the error message if one was emitted by a failing revert or require and emit it in an occasion. There are two methods to attain this:

1. Utilizing catch Error(string reminiscence motive)

operate createCharitySplitter(tackle _charityOwner) public {
    strive new CharitySplitter(_charityOwner) returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch Error(string reminiscence motive)
    {
        errorCount++;
        CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter = new
            CharitySplitter(msg.sender);
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        // Emitting the error in occasion
        emit ErrorHandled(motive);
    }
    catch
    {
        errorCount++;
    }
}

Which emits the next occasion on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorHandled(
    motive: 'no-owner-provided' (kind: string)
)

2. Utilizing catch (bytes reminiscence motive)

operate createCharitySplitter(tackle charityOwner) public {
    strive new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch (bytes reminiscence motive) {
        errorCount++;
        emit ErrorNotHandled(motive);
    }
}

Which emits the next occasion on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorNotHandled(
  motive: hex'08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000116e6f2d6f776e65722d70726f7669646564000000000000000000000000000000' (kind: bytes)

The above two strategies for retrieving the error string produce the same outcome. The distinction is that the second methodology doesn’t ABI-decode the error string. The benefit of the second methodology is that additionally it is executed if ABI decoding the error string fails or if no motive was offered.

Future plans

There are plans to launch assist for error sorts which means we can declare errors in the same approach to occasions permitting us to catch completely different kind of errors, for instance:

catch CustomErrorA(uint data1) { … }
catch CustomErrorB(uint[] reminiscence data2) { … }
catch {}