In response to former SEC legal professional John Reed Stark the present SEC, below the chairmanship of Gary Gensler, is unlikely to approve a Bitcoin spot ETF utility centering on important regulatory issues, together with the power to forestall fraud and defend traders.
The SEC crypto divide.
Apparently, Stark believes the difficulty of crypto regulation has advanced right into a partisan divide inside the SEC, a dramatic shift from the bipartisan consensus towards cryptocurrencies when Stark first started writing concerning the topic in 2017.
This partisanship has manifested in varied methods, together with the SEC’s crypto crackdown initiated by former Republican-appointed SEC Chair Jay Clayton, notable for his staunch criticism and sweeping regulatory actions towards cryptocurrencies.
The potential impression of the upcoming 2024 U.S. presidential election on the regulatory panorama is one other issue to contemplate, in response to Stark. If a Republican is elected, he predicts a major lower within the SEC’s crypto-enforcement efforts.
This potential discount might result in a extra crypto-friendly surroundings, with the SEC probably turning into extra receptive to approving a Bitcoin spot ETF. Moreover, different important crypto-friendly regulatory actions could also be extra more likely to happen.
Stark additionally highlighted that the SEC, being an unbiased federal company, is topic to management modifications following presidential elections.
Hester Peirce, coined because the “crypto-mom” by Stark for her help of cryptocurrencies, might grow to be the appearing Chair if a Republican is elected, with the present Chair, Gensler, more likely to resign.
Given Peirce’s prolonged report of dissent in the direction of most crypto-related SEC actions, this variation might considerably impression the SEC’s stance on cryptocurrencies.
Higher Markets letter to SEC.
Stark additionally referenced a Higher Markets letter to the SEC which famous a number of points with the proposed rule modifications that may enable the itemizing and buying and selling of spot Bitcoin ETFs.
These embody issues about manipulation within the Bitcoin market, with allegations of “wash buying and selling” creating false volumes.
Moreover, Higher Markets argued that the proposed surveillance-sharing agreements with buying and selling platforms like Coinbase are inadequate to detect manipulation, provided that Coinbase represents solely 5% of worldwide Bitcoin buying and selling.
The group additionally factors out that concentrated possession of Bitcoin presents a threat, with 50 miners controlling half of the mining capability and the highest 10,000 Bitcoin wallets proudly owning 27% of Bitcoins.
In the end, Stark asserted that the SEC’s choices on Bitcoin ETFs and associated regulatory points are more likely to be influenced by varied components, together with inside politics, the broader political panorama, and ongoing issues about market manipulation and investor safety.
Because the political spectrum stands as we speak, Stark doesn’t consider a spot Bitcoin ETF will likely be authorised, and it’ll require modifications to the regulatory panorama for it to take action.