Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
This week’s tragic taking pictures of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York has raised concern concerning the safety of company leaders.
CNN says, “UnitedHealthcare CEO’s killing exhibits why firms spend tens of millions to guard their high executives.” A Forbes columnist predicts that “after the taking pictures… safety personnel might be in demand.” And, in keeping with this Wall Avenue Journal report, his killing “prompted an instantaneous re-evaluation of longstanding safety practices throughout company America,” and “dozens” of safety chiefs from massive U.S. firms convened collectively on a name to debate the scenario.
“The setting is explosive proper now,” a former Boston police commissioner who now (no shock) consults with massive firms on mitigating safety dangers instructed the Journal. “The threats are evolving and getting extra violent.”
Okay, let’s relax, lets?
In fact, there’s purpose behind this concern. Company executives usually are not solely extra within the highlight than ever earlier than, however they’re additionally not too arduous to search out. They attend public occasions, shareholder conferences and social features all around the world. Typically, firms make their schedules public or publish press releases noting the place they’re going to be. Getting maintain of their dwelling addresses is a number of steps on-line. Digging into their private relationships takes minutes, due to LinkedIn, X and Fb.
In the event you’re a company govt, you’ll be able to simply be focused by somebody who, say, desires to proper a improper or impersonate a social justice warrior for quarter-hour of fame. However this isn’t a brand new factor, is it?
Uber’s former CEO, Travis Kalanick, was egged in Taiwan in 2017. Invoice Gates was hit with a pie within the face throughout an abroad go to in 1998. Rubert Murdoch and the CEOs of Qantas Airways and the now defunct Enron Company additionally obtained pie-ed. Frankly, a lot of enterprise leaders and celebrities have been “involuntarily” pied over time.
However the homicide of a CEO is, clearly, way more severe. Fortunately, these conditions haven’t solely been few and much between however virtually non-existent.
An promoting govt was murdered in New Jersey in 1994, however that turned out to be the Unabomber’s doing. A Microsoft govt was shot and killed in Florida in 2022, however the wrongdoer turned out to be his ex-wife’s husband. George Tiller, who owned a ladies’s well being clinic in Kansas, was murdered by an anti-abortion extremist at a church service (his clinic was the goal of “a number of assaults” beforehand).
I do not wish to downplay or trivialize the gravity of what occurred to Thompson. However I’ve searched Google and varied chatbots like Perplexity and ChatGPT for examples of different CEOs who’ve met the identical destiny and are available up brief.
There are presently 55,000 publicly held firms on the planet, and the U.S. has greater than six million employee-owned companies alone. These firms are led not solely by CEOs and enterprise homeowners however by groups of senior executives who would all make engaging targets for the eye seeker. And but, there are very, only a few incidents like this. Senior executives appear extra liable to succumbing to a snowboarding accident or happening in a airplane crash than some random individual taking pictures them level clean on a busy New York Metropolis road.
Which is why we must always all relax for a minute. The media loves to take advantage of the worst of our fears and anxieties to get clicks. In order that they write issues like “safety might be in demand” and “the setting is explosive.” Posts like these from irresponsible “journalists” definitely don’t assist both. It is an ideal advertising and marketing second for safety corporations. However ought to firms be making knee-jerk choices to all-of-the-sudden begin spending vital sums for safety over what appears to be an remoted incident? In case your CEO is Mark Zuckerberg, a star, I get it. However for all others? I am not so positive.
Associated: Here is How Entrepreneurs Can Defend Their Firm From Cyberattacks
Why? As a result of individuals do not go round taking pictures different individuals. Our methods — whereas they do not catch everybody — are fairly good at isolating these with felony histories or who want watching. Weapons may be obtained each legally and illegally, however pulling off a taking pictures requires persistence, ability and planning.
In fact, individuals in public positions must be cautious in at this time’s world. CEOs who get political or concerned in social points or help sure controversial causes are rising their threat of assault from a tiny fraction of lunatics that oppose them. Executives who run corporations which are concerned in life and dying issues, resembling healthcare, additionally must be cautious. All leaders have to concentrate on their environment. In the event that they obtain threats — as Thompson allegedly did — they have to take them severely. These are the conditions the place added safety measures are wanted, be it supplied by native police or by way of personal corporations.
However as you’ll be able to see from the numbers, these conditions are few and much between. So, nobody ought to be panicking. Firms needn’t encompass their CEOs with secret service-type brokers in sun shades. Some do, and so they pay tens of millions for the privilege. However for the overwhelming majority of company executives, they will take coronary heart that we have not gotten to that time. And I do not assume we’ll ever get to that time — a minimum of not within the foreseeable future.
Thompson’s taking pictures was tragic. But it surely was a uncommon occasion. An anomaly. We should always mourn for this man. However, with apologies to the safety business, we should not be overreacting.