ordinals – Command Difficulty: Discrepancy in SATS Token Transaction

0
64


I’m reaching out to this group in hopes of gaining readability on a transaction concern I not too long ago encountered.

Background:
I carried out a sequence of transactions immediately from my node utilizing the next script: https://github.com/codeunsolved/brc20tool. I’ve utilized this script on a number of events with none points.

Particulars:

  • BTC Cost Tackle: bc1p8welxq7lx55ane5nhcwfe00k6k6c9m5lty3crnvhwlnalykz2srqhm38zr. Moreover, I’ve a Nested Segwit tackle: 3NQW1gkVagaU5Y2qNKrpN6BGDo2ujBJdC3.

  • Transaction ID: https://mempool.area/tx/369a184f3e941a501b99a2865f6c1db09f39af379ef8c63fb52689e37e3376a7.
    Whereas the mempool signifies over 300 confirmations for this transaction, decoding the HEX reveals 0 confirmations. I initiated a minting of SATS tokens 500 occasions in a single transaction, however solely 20 tokens had been obtained. The middleman BTC switch was profitable, however there appears to be a problem with the next processing.

HEX Snippet:

],
"block_height": -1,
"block_index": -1,
"confirmations": 0,
"double_spend": false,
"charges": 367829,
"hash": "369a184f3e941a501b99a2865f6c1db09f39af379ef8c63fb52689e37e3376a7",
"inputs": [

Ordinals Link: https://ordinals.com/tx/369a184f3e941a501b99a2865f6c1db09f39af379ef8c63fb52689e37e3376a7.

I would greatly appreciate any insights or suggestions from members who might have encountered similar issues or have expertise in this area.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here