Coinbase has stepped into the Prime Belief chapter case, submitting an amicus transient to push again towards a movement that would threaten buyer asset protections.
In a Feb. 5 court docket submitting, the alternate has urged the court docket to uphold Uniform Industrial Code (UCC) Article 8, a authorized framework that ensures custodial belongings stay prospects’ property.
In response to the alternate:
“Article 8 incorporates unambiguous statutory textual content that events could conform to deal with a number of belongings, together with money or digital belongings, as monetary belongings credited to a securities account, and that belongings topic to such settlement usually are not property of the custodian’s property.”
Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Authorized Officer (CLO), additional emphasised in an X put up that UCC Article 8 establishes a elementary precept—buyer belongings saved by custodians don’t belong to the custodian. As an alternative, they continue to be the property of the rightful house owners.
In response to Grewal, Coinbase and Prime Belief have person agreements that clearly state that prospects retain full possession of their belongings. He argued that any try and classify these holdings as a part of a custodian’s property throughout chapter would contradict these agreements and undermine authorized protections.
Grewal pressured that UCC Article 8 isn’t just about crypto—it’s a foundational authorized safeguard designed to maintain buyer belongings separate from a custodian’s holdings. He warned that permitting belongings to be absorbed into Prime Belief’s chapter proceedings might erode market belief and disrupt monetary stability.
The difficulty arose after Prime Belief filed for Chapter 11 chapter in August 2023 following extreme monetary troubles. As a part of its chapter proceedings, the property’s managers filed a Willpower Movement on Jan. 15, proposing to merge buyer funds with the platform’s belongings.
Coinbase believes that granting this movement might set a harmful precedent that weakens prospects’ authorized protections in crypto and conventional finance.
Contemplating this, the agency urged the court docket to reject the Willpower Movement to make sure that established authorized protections stay intact.
Grewal concluded that courts have constantly bolstered these ideas and will do the identical on this case. He wrote:
“Defending buyer belongings is paramount to belief and safety.”
Talked about on this article
