We’ve got the distinctive aggressive benefit right here on a pair fronts. Primary, now we have a very diversified jurisdictional and geographic management of the vault and personal key, proper? Nobody can compete with that, and that is essential, till now we have a harmonized international regulation. With out that, that is the foolproof setup. There isn’t any single level of failure. It is nearly inconceivable for 3 completely different jurisdictions to collude if they do not prefer it. In order that’s primary. Quantity two, we strike the proper stability between centralized and decentralized. The centralized aspect is completely vital if you wish to develop an essential strategic asset like wrapped bitcoin, if you wish to develop by scale, you need to have a trusted get together to carry billions of multi billions, tens of billions of Bitcoin, proper? You can’t. I am personally not conscious of any decentralized mission that may simply take away your bitcoin and say, belief me, it is at all times there, the minute you need it, it is at all times there. I’m personally not conscious of something like that. On the decentralized entrance, they are saying, belief me, proper? And simply depart your bitcoin with us, and there isn’t any accountability if one thing goes incorrect. These individuals do not even go by their actual names, proper? They go by every kind of unusual animal names. These days, I do know figuring out with the animal is kind of stylish within the U.S., proper? However at the very least we go by our actual names. After which on the centralized facet, in contrast with [Coinbase’s] cBTC, we’re not topic to a continuing subpoena by some authorities regulator, like within the case of Coinbase, proper? They are going to get the subpoena on any given time in relation to any belongings, any shoppers who onboard with CBTC, proper? We do not have that in Hong Kong, in Singapore. The regulation could be very completely different, very clear minimize, very completely different, proper?