A neighborhood member began a dialogue amongst members within the Mantle decentralized autonomous group (DAO), proposing to limit the collapsed FTX trade and Alameda Analysis from changing their BitDAO (BIT) tokens value $43 million to Mantle (MNT) amid the continuing token migration course of.
On Nov. 2, 2021, BitDAO swapped 100 million BIT with Alameda in trade for over 3.3 million FTX tokens (FTT). The commerce got here with a public dedication to carry one another’s tokens for a span of three years, which is till Nov. 2, 2024. Nonetheless, amid the FTX fallout in 2022, BitDAO suspected Alameda of dumping the tokens and inflicting BIT to plummet. On the time, former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison denied their involvement within the dump.
Associated: BitDAO’s Mantle Core workforce proposes $200M for Web3 fund
Quick ahead a couple of months and the BitDAO neighborhood proposed the unification of the BitDAO ecosystem which had BitDAO as its governance arm and Mantle as its product. On Might 12, neighborhood member Cateatpeanut initiated a governance vote to unify each beneath the Mantle banner, which might additionally imply that BIT holders would have their tokens transformed into MNT. On Might 19, the proposal to unify Mantle and BitDAO handed with overwhelming assist from its neighborhood.
On Aug 17, the matter of the BIT tokens held by Alameda turned a topic of dialogue for Mantle neighborhood members. Cateatpeanut argued that FTX Group’s BIT shouldn’t be robotically transformed to MNT due to “numerous disqualifying elements.” In accordance with the neighborhood member, there isn’t a “assured proper of migration” for the tokens, and he then initiated the proposal.
Inside the proposal, the neighborhood member requested to implement a brand new MNT migration sensible contract that is ready to limit the automated migration of FTX-owned tokens. The neighborhood member additionally highlighted that the on-chain migration contract has been paused till the conclusion of the dialogue and the vote.
Journal: Ought to we ban ransomware funds? It’s a horny however harmful thought