Bitcoin Stack Change is a query and reply website for Bitcoin crypto-currency fanatics. It solely takes a minute to enroll.
Anyone can ask a query
Anyone can reply
The most effective solutions are voted up and rise to the highest
Requested
Seen
14 instances
“Not your keys, not your cash” is frequent mantra. I assumed all I wanted to do was to safeguard my personal keys (through {hardware} pockets, chilly storage) to have the ability to reconstitute my BTC at any level sooner or later. Nevertheless, I lately learn an, admittedly fairly previous, article stating that this isn’t enough; that I need to additionally safeguard my derivation path in an effort to reconstitute a pockets sooner or later.
I’ve a number of questions associated to this:
- Typically talking, is that this as a result of completely different derivation paths can yield, in the end, completely different public keys, and thus if I haven’t got my derivation path saved, I could also be unable to reconstitute a pockets that reaches the addresses of my UTXOs?
- If that’s the case, how can I A. receive the derivation path from my {hardware} pockets and B. how is that this sometimes saved?
- How does this play in with multisig? The article signifies the order of the multisig arrange can change the derivation path. Is that this just like me needing to ‘hold observe of UTXOs’ in terms of multisig? I’ve heard this usually earlier than however am probably not positive what’s means; do I must hold a listing of all the general public addresses related to the multisig? Is solely a listing of the addresses enough? What if the wallets are from completely different producers? Have they got completely different derivation paths?
- Why is that this not talked about extra? A random tweet I noticed at this time was the primary time I’ve heard of this.