Mintos has stated it’s “defending the pursuits of our traders” in courtroom instances in opposition to Russian mortgage originator Kviku, as its consultants work to get well funds.
The European lending market has been recovering war-affected loans in its portolio since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. This has been difficult attributable to sanctions and fee limitations imposed by Russia and the EU.
It recovered €10m as of three March this yr, and stated agreements have been reached with all Russian lending firms other than Kviku.
The battle centres round Kviku’s choice to transform its euro-denominated debt to Mintos traders right into a ruble-denominated bond that matures in 2026.
Mintos stated it by no means agreed to this strategy as it’s not within the pursuits of traders and believes that the conversion violates native necessities.
Learn extra: Mintos defends choice to shut Revo case with out full restoration of funds
“Simply days earlier than Kviku issued the bonds for the aim of changing the debt, the administration and house owners of Kviku reassured us that they have been making use of for particular permission from the Central Financial institution of Russia to make transfers bigger than the RUB 10m month-to-month restrict,” Mintos stated.
“It goes with out saying that that they had already been engaged on the bond issuance for a number of months earlier than the precise situation. We’ve no factual proof of any actions being taken by Kviku to acquire the particular permission from the Central Financial institution of Russia for cash transfers.
“Since then, Kviku has tried to take away the pledges on its portfolio for the funded loans on Mintos by approaching the notary, and after that was not met with success, by submitting courtroom instances in Russia in late December 2022.
Learn extra: Mintos plans to supply ETFs later this yr
“After Mintos filed objections to Kviku’s courtroom functions, one of many functions was dismissed by the courtroom and the opposite one was withdrawn by Kviku earlier than the courtroom dominated on the matter.
“Kviku claimed that no agreements exist and no cash was transferred for the a part of the portfolio arising from ahead circulate investments. These claims by Kviku are clearly not true. Ahead circulate investments signify a smaller a part of the portfolio.”
Mintos stated it’s being represented in these courtroom instances and defending the pursuits of its traders, whereas its consultants “are additionally actively engaged on recovering traders’ cash”.
“Please perceive that we will solely share info on authorized instances with a delay, as being too clear may give away important info to the opposing occasion,” Mintos added. “We’ll share extra updates as quickly as we will.”