Bitcoin Stack Change is a query and reply website for Bitcoin crypto-currency fanatics. It solely takes a minute to enroll.
Anyone can ask a query
Anyone can reply
The perfect solutions are voted up and rise to the highest
Requested
Seen
218 occasions
There are a number of entities and open-source software program that crawl the Bitcoin P2P community to find and monitor nodes for varied functions (statistics, surveys, tutorial papers and so on.)
A few of these I’m conscious of:
btc_node_scanner
dsn.tm.package.edu
nodes.multiven.io
bitnodes.earn.com
bitnodes.io
-
Banning such nodes would free my connection slots for actual helpful nodes that really present consensus sourcing.
However, is there any draw back to banning such crawler nodes? -
Additionally, what about banning
btc-seeder
nodes? Would that have an effect on negatively the well being of the P2P community?
I feel the best reply might present the consequences to 2 circumstances:
- banning finished by one person and the way they’re affected
- banning finished by a grand/significant variety of customers and the way the general community could be affected
Thanks
1
It might be exhausting to particularly ban crawlers as a sensible matter as a result of there isn’t any dependable method to differentiate them from different regular nodes. They will, actually, simply be regular nodes which can be instrumented with code to gather the specified knowledge and report it again to an aggregation system.
So then you’re left with banning regular nodes. Since the entire worth of working a node comes from its connectivity to the P2P community through different nodes, this is able to not make sense.
2